What's necessary to build
sustainable business success? Lasting client relationships. Imagine if
you never had any repeat business. Could you survive? Highly unlikely.
So keeping existing clients deserves every bit the focus that finding new ones does.
It's
interesting, then, that most firms pay substantially more attention to
winning new clients than taking care of their current ones. If you doubt that conclusion, consider these questions:
How much of your strategic plan is devoted to improving business
development compared to improving client care? Do you have a sales
process, but not a relationship building process? Which receives more of
your training budget? Or more discussion in staff meetings?
Obviously, there's
nothing wrong with giving emphasis to business development. In fact,
most firms could stand to give it more. But let's not overlook the fact
that the best way to grow your business is usually through existing
client relationships. Are you taking steps to make those relationships
stronger? Here are five suggestions to do just that:
1. Create a client relationship building process.
You probably have a few individuals in your firm who are skilled at
nurturing strong client relationships. And some who aren't. Therein lies
the problem—a crucial function that's left to individual competency and
initiative. You don't manage projects that way; there are standard
procedures to ensure some measure of consistency. In fact there are many
less critical activities in your firm that have been defined as a
repeatable process.
So
why not an approach for building client relationships? Of course, there
are interpersonal dynamics in relationships that are not easily
programed. But if marriages can be strengthened by applying generic tips
from a book or conference, such improvements can certainly be realized
with clients. The key is to define certain elements of relationship
building that lend themselves to being replicated across the
organization. Here's how to get started:
- Identify common traits among your best client relationships
- Determine the steps that were taken to build those relationships
- Develop a relationship building process based on your assessment
- Pilot this process with a few clients with growth potential
2. Clarify mutual expectations.
For every project, you develop a scope of work, schedule, and budget
that the client reviews and approves. But many aspects of the working
relationship—such as communication, decision making, client involvement,
managing changes, and monitoring satisfaction—are not discussed and
explicitly agreed upon with the client. In my experience, most service breakdowns are
caused by unknown or misunderstood expectations.
To
delight clients and win their loyalty, you need to know how they like
to be served. Over time this becomes clearer, but you may not make it
that far. How much better to simply ask what the client's expectations
are up front, as well as to share what you'd like from the client in return to make the relationship stronger? This is a practice I call "service benchmarking," and you may find my Client Service Planner helpful in this regard.
3. Increase client touches.
These are simply the direct and indirect interactions you have with
clients. Too often these touches are limited to times of necessity. This
is the project manager who only calls when there's a problem. Or the
principal who is out of sight until the next RFP approaches. Clients
notice. Perhaps the biggest complaint I've heard in the many client
interviews I've conducted is the failure of A/E firms to communicate proactively.
What are some ways to increase client touches? Consider the following:
- Invite the client to your project kickoff meeting
- Send monthly project status reports
- Share internal project meeting minutes and action items
- Call to discuss issues before they become problems
- Send articles, papers, reports,and tools of interest to the client
4. Periodically seek performance feedback. Having clarified expectations in advance, it's important to check in on occasion
to ask how well you're doing. The frequency and timing of these
discussions is hopefully one of the expectations you established during
the benchmarking step. This is another valuable way to increase client
touches.
About 1 in 4 firms in this business formally solicit client feedback, and reportedly only about 5
percent do it regularly. So there's a tremendous opportunity for you to
distinguish your firm with your clients. Here are some tips for getting
effective feedback:
- Have someone not directly involved in the project do this
- Mix both discussions and a standard questionnaire
- Talk to multiple parties in the client organization if possible
- Be sure to follow up promptly to any concerns identified
5. Don't disappear between projects.
This relates back to my advice about client touches; don't limit them
only to when it's in your self interest. Keep in touch with the client
after the project is completed—for the client's sake. For one thing, the
real value of your work isn't realized until the facility you designed
is put into operation or the recommendations in your report are acted
upon. You want to be talking with the client when these moments of
truth happen, whether it's part of your contract or not.
Offer
whatever support you can to further ensure the project's success. But
you also want to demonstrate your interest in the client's success
outside the project. Provide helpful information and advice, in person,
over the phone, and digitally (as part of your content marketing effort).
The time between projects (assuming you've won the client's trust to do
another project together) can be a productive relationship building
time, because it's often unexpected. Having met the client's
expectations during the project, this is another chance to exceed them.
In my last post I argued that all project managers should be contributing to their firm's sales efforts. Only half do, according to the Zweig Group. A prominent reason for the low participation is that most PMs don't feel competent or comfortable in this role (and this is also true of many who are involved in sales!). As I wrote previously, I'm confident that capable PMs can successfully transfer their project management skills to selling—it's much the same skill set. Here are some suggestions for helping them make that transition:
Train them in a service-centered approach to selling. The problem most PMs have with selling is that they have an overwhelmingly negative impression of salespeople. They have their own experiences as a buyer, and that taints their view of selling. But rather than avoid selling, they should be striving to change the experience for those who buy the firm's services. Serve prospective clients rather than sell to them.
"High-end selling and consulting are not different and separate skills," observes sales researcher Neil Rackham, "When we are watching the very best [seller-doers] in their interactions with clients, we cannot tell whether they are consulting, selling, or delivering." For the A/E professional, this means uncovering needs, offering advice, recommending solutions—giving a meaningful sample of what it will be like working together under contract. This kind of approach takes the sting out of selling for both the PM and the client.
Budget time specifically for sales. The other big excuse for why PMs don't sell is that there isn't enough time. Or more specifically, that spending time developing new business subtracts from time on billable project work. Given the obsession with utilization that exists in many firms, it's hardly surprising that this perception is so prevalent. But the claim is seldom supported by the facts.
Nearly all PMs work a substantial number of nonbillable hours, a portion of which could be devoted to sales activities. The problem is that these hours are rarely budgeted or managed, so that in effect selling is done with leftover time. And who has surplus time left over? You can minimize the concern that selling displaces billable hours by managing your business development efforts like project work, including budgeting a portion existing nonbillable hours for this purpose.
Fit sales responsibilities to PMs' individual strengths. Selling is not as monolithic an activity as many presume, nor does it favor a specific personality type. There is a potential sales role for virtually anyone in your firm, including your PMs. Some are comfortable at networking functions, others better at one-on-one conversations. Some are big-picture strategists, others more analytical problem solvers. Some are competent writers, others better in communicating verbally. Some may be capable in making sales calls, others are better assigned to doing research, writing proposals, or developing solutions. The key is fitting the right people to the right roles.
PMs often claim that they don't have the personality to sell. But the research finds no real correlation between personality type and sales success. Fit, again, is the critical strategy. Help PMs shape their sales responsibilities around both their capabilities and their personality.
Bolster your marketing efforts.
Technical professionals typically struggle more in starting the sales process than in closing the sale. They often dislike prospecting for new
leads, especially making cold calls, attending networking events, and initiating client relationships.
Effective marketing can shorten the sales cycle by bringing interested
prospects to your door. Most PMs are much more comfortable picking up
the sales effort at this point.
Where
to start? Consider the marketing tactics that have proven most effective for professional service firms. These activities typically
require significant support from the firm's content experts, which
likely will include at least some of your PMs. They don't want to make cold
calls or work the room? How about giving a presentation, helping write
an article, or contributing to a seminar? Involvement in marketing not only
builds the firm's brand, but the personal brands of your PMs—making it
easier for them to sell.
Increase collaboration. Selling is often a lonely activity, which further magnifies the discomfort most PMs have with it. That's why I favor building your sales team, where those involved in sales regularly meet together, share information, encourage one another, plan sales pursuits, and hold each other accountable. Have members of the team work together on sales calls when that makes sense. The investment you make in promoting collaboration, in my experience, will more than pay off in increased sales productivity.
Provide ongoing coaching. Sales coaching can dramatically improve results for your PMs engaged in selling. If you do training, as suggested above, you'll need to reinforce it to make it successful—meaning real-time feedback and instruction. Organizing your sales team can provide opportunities for peer-to-peer coaching. Pairing up PMs with your best sellers is another option. Or you may decide to seek outside support from a consultant. A good coach helps build both the PM's capabilities and motivation in the most effective manner—on the job.
Being a project manager is a tough job. I get that. PMs are charged with keeping the client happy, delivering a technically sound solution, meeting the budget and schedule, coordinating the project team, interacting with multiple project stakeholders, ensuring the quality of deliverables, and often a myriad of other management, supervisory, and administrative duties outside of their project work.
Did I mention business development? Is it fair to add that responsibility to an already long to-do list? According to a Zweig Group survey, only 4% of PMs claimed no involvement in BD activities. Over 80% indicated they contribute to proposals, 60% make presentations, and 55% participate in sales activities. That last number surprises me. I think it should be closer to 100%.
I can hear the howls of disapproval. Numerous PMs have told me they don't have the time or the personality or the desire to get involved in selling. Many firms seem to concur, putting little if any pressure on PMs to actively support sales activities. But there are several reasons why I believe PMs are needed to have a truly successful sales process:
PMs are the primary contacts with clients. Or at least they should be. PMs are typically the ones who work closest with clients on projects. I've seen situations where principals or department heads assumed this role, but it's less than ideal. In interviewing hundreds of clients over the years, it's clear that the overwhelming majority favor strong PMs who take charge of ensuring project success and serve as the primary liaison with the client and other stakeholders. This role alone makes PMs the logical choice to support the firm's sales efforts.
PMs are one of the critical assets you are selling. You can try to sell the firm's qualifications, but most clients want to know about the individuals who specifically will be working on their project. Chief among these project team members is the PM. Who can best sell the PM's strengths to the client? The PM, ideally. Not by telling, but by demonstrating. The nature of professional services is that we sell the people who perform the services. And the person who most needs to gain the client's confidence, in most cases, is the PM.
Selling should be about serving. I've encountered many PMs who were reluctant to sell to existing clients because they feared it might taint the project relationship. I understand their concern, if you look at it through the lens of traditional selling. But the most effective way to develop new business with clients in the A/E business is not by pushing your services. It's about serving—about meeting needs, providing advice, identifying solutions. If PMs really care about their relationship with clients, they should be looking for other ways to help.
PMs have the right skill set for selling. If you accept my previous point that serving clients is the best way to "sell," then it follows that PMs (good ones, at least) are particularly suited for this task. Who better to help clients? Strong PMs generally are more effective at bringing a broader, multidisciplinary perspective to the project than the technical practitioners who will make up the rest of the project team. PMs should have client skills that readily transfer to a service-centered approach to sales.
Despite claims to the contrary, the skill set for project management is much the same as for selling in this manner: Interpersonal skills, communication, problem solving, planning, collaboration, follow-through, etc. Any PM who cannot sell is probably not very good at project management either. And the claim that they don't have the personality? Research shows no correlation between personality and sales success.
Participation in sales increases a sense of ownership. There's something about building a relationship from scratch with a client that engenders a deeper sense of ownership of that relationship. My observation is that PMs who are actively involved in selling are generally more committed to keeping clients happy. Perhaps that's because they engaged the client before the relationship could be mistaken as simply completing a scope of work.
At a minimum, I think it's critically important to involve the PM in defining the proposal strategy, winning the shortlist interview, and negotiating the contract. PMs should always be involved in determining the scope, schedule, and budget of the project—they shouldn't be asked to deliver something they had no part in defining.
Agree or disagree? I'd love to hear what you think about the PM's role in sales. Next post I'll offer some suggestions for helping PMs succeed in selling.